2/
20.
as
regards M. Murrow's assertion
in the concluding part of paragraph 25 that "half of Mr. Farranti
term of
sentence
by
me
from
because I
was remitted
was
aware
a note Sir John Bowring
wrote to his son
then resident
heard
" here, that instructions would be received to that effect by the mail next expected" that there is not the slightest shadow of truthe in this statement _ I until now that Sir John Bowring had ever written to his son on the subject, and I had determined half of Mr Farranti
to remit one
never
sentence within a few weeks of
2 مباد
339
the date of his conviction, and had
as will
so informed Mr. Fivrant,
reference to my
be seen
M
Despatch 1.79 of 6th June 1860.
Paragraph 27 is es
conclusively answered by a letter from M. Alexander which I forward herewith, that it is unnecessary for word on the subject
me to add
Paragraph 28 expresses the
Murrow's opinion upon mur Alexander's appointment to the acting chief Magisting
in 1860
and to the acting Colonial Secretaryship
T
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.